>
|
|
An example of a rationally summable expression:
| (2) |
Check the telescoping equation:
>
|
|
A hypergeometrically summable term:
>
|
|
>
|
|
The method of accurate summation:
>
|
|
| (8) |
Sum of a logarithm of a rational function (provided the argument of the logarithm has constant sign):
>
|
|
>
|
|
| (10) |
Example for the library extension mechanism:
| (12) |
Compute the fail points:
>
|
|
Indeed, is not defined for any negative integer:
and limits do not exist:
A rational example. and its limit are not defined at , and the correspondent sum and its limit are not defined at :
>
|
|
| (17) |
In the next example, is hypergeometric term defined for all integers :
>
|
|
>
|
|
| (20) |
The sum is not defined at :
Note that in this example, however, the limit exists:
but the telescoping equation does not hold at :
>
|
|
Consequently, if is between summation bounds, the Newton-Leibniz formula is wrong:
>
|
|
| (23) |
Rewriting in terms of GAMMA functions introduces additional singularities at negative integers. These singularities are removable:
| (24) |
>
|
|
| (25) |
The telescoping equation is valid for all integers (in the limit):
>
|
|
| (26) |
The singularities of are detected if _EnvFormal (see sum,details) is set to :
>
|
|
>
|
|
| (27) |
>
|
|